[PDF] The Pfizer Inoculations For COVID-19 – More Harm Than Good
Get the presentation as PDF
Time Stamps for Video Presentation
Courtesy of Electronic-Base-1397
1:00 mark - although they only provide the standard for Canada, these standards are similar in most developed countries
1:25 hierarchy of evidence
1:58 Pfizer’s original trial report (Dec 31 2020).
2:30 explains absolute risk reduction v. Relative risk reduction (aka explains how Pfizer used a fraudulent misnomer to claim 95% efficacy)
4:00 early unblinding of the control group and impacts on long term safety data
4:17 - may 23, 2023 was the intended end date of phase III of the Pfizer trial, a point in time we have not yet reached
5:10 Pfizer’s 6 month report data and level 1 evidence of harm
5:24 data showed that there was a reduction in positive cases in the vaxxed, but also an increase in illness and deaths
5:35 increased risk of illness
7:15 increased risk of death
9:10 Pfizer did not follow established protocols
9:23 - usually development timeline is 5-10 years, rarely can be done in 5.
9:31 phases skipped by Pfizer’s safety trial
9:50 mRNA has been “tested” but actually mRNA is the delivery system, not the “medicine” it delivers/mRNA delivery has not been proven safe
10:08 misleading demographics
12:20 inadequate control groups
13:10 low quality safety science- didn’t track biomarkers
14:50 wrong clinical endpoints
16:30 not tested for spread reduction
16:53 testing failures and subjective testing
pfizer trials did not test all participants for Covid instead, instructed investigators to only test those with a Covid symptom, and investigators had discretion to determine what those were
17:28 missing data - “suspected, but unconfirmed” & failure to follow up
19:05 failure to test and why it matters
19:45 how Pfizer used fraudulent data to manipulate their relative risk reduction of 19% which this video claims needs to be at 50% for EUA (I have not been able to verify this claim about EUA any information about it is welcome)
19:55 the 12-15 adolescent trial
21:00 tragic story of Maddie de Garay’s side effects, who is currently wheelchair bound and fed through a tube due to the vaxx
21:37 Pfizer described her scenario in their report as “the participant was eventually diagnosed with functional abdominal pain”
21:49 risk of 5-11 yr olds and myocarditis from vaxx, level 5 evidence of harm
23:26 Dr. Eric Rubin, FDA advisory panel & editor-in-chief of the New England Journal of Medicine which publishes the Pfizer vaxx trial reports, suggesting that a population level roll out was an appropriate way to test for adverse events
24:46 the British medical journal publishes whistleblower story about Ventavia
25:44 6 month data manipulation- mixed cohorts
26:20 overview - Pfizer trials did not prove safety, they proved harm
27:03 how this is playing out in the real world- roll out surveillance, compares trial participant surveillance to surveillance of population
28:58 rising incidents of heart issues in young people - many studies are starting to show this trend as well
29:40 deaths in athletes on the rise
30:11 analyzed data of FIFA over the past 20 years (2000-2020) shows average rate of sudden deaths to be 4.2 per year. In 2021, there were 21– 5x the normal average
31:01 Pfizer’s post marketing pharmacovigilance report
31:55 conflicts of interest
32:25 Pfizer’s public record of being shitty (many links provided in pdf)
33:05 Pfizer’s conflict of interest - amount of Pfizer report authors with conflicts (84%)
33:40 two of the authors are also founders of BioNTech, husband and wife(Uğur Şahin (CEO) and Özlem Türeci (CMO)) whose stock value increased by $9 billion dollars
33:53 CDC redefines “vaccine” after Walensky admitted the Covid vaxxes don’t provide immunity
Went from “A product that stimulates a person’s immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease, protecting the person from that disease."
To—> “A preparation that is used to stimulate the body’s immune response against diseases.”
38:05 why isn’t the media reporting on it?